Chapter 1928: 1928
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
"San Francisco Chronicle", fifty minutes.
"Los Angeles Times", forty minutes.
"Voice of the Village", 60 minutes.
"The Guardian", fifty points.
When I saw all these failing scores, I couldn't believe that this was actually a cooperative project of "Nolanga Hall", which was shocking.
In addition, there is also the "Variety Show" magazine, which also gave a 60-point evaluation.
"This movie can be expanded in many ways, but unfortunately, Nolan chose to present this ambitious project in the most boring and least breathtaking way, completely lost in the vastness and vagueness of space. Among them, even Hall's high-level performance failed to save the mediocrity and tackiness at the core of the theme.
Does Nolan only have this kind of understanding of family affection? Or is it that Nolan's film language is not enough to show the complexity and depth of human nature? Is the director who filmed the "Dark Knight" still there? The only good news is that those talking to themselves in space cannot be heard on Earth. "
Starting from the serious negative reviews of "Playlist", "Interstellar" is being chased by film critics, severe criticism is endless, and you can clearly feel the hatred of iron and steel from the industry, which is the core of Nolan's story. And the main direction is totally different.
If you look carefully at the film reviews, you can find that the criticism mainly comes from disappointment and gaps.
Science fiction movies such as "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Blade Runner" can withstand the test of time and eventually become classics of movie history. The main reason lies in the discussion of human nature. In the context of science fiction-humans and clones, humans and The exploration of human nature between machines has undoubtedly raised the ideological core of the film to a whole new level.
However, "Interstellar Crossing" has put all its focus on... "Generating electricity with love". From the perspective of depth and breadth of thinking, this is definitely a serious miss. Although at the end of the movie, Lan Li once again used performances to regain a city, giving the theme more possibilities; but since the reunion of Cooper and Murphy, the whole story has lost the possibility of deep thinking, let alone stand the test of time Now you can see the essence of its "soap opera".
This is definitely not the space epic that people are looking forward to.
It seems that this is the most severe criticism and attack on Renly's work since "detachment". To be precise, even "detachment" has not faced such a fierce attack-at least, "detachment" is an author's film. Film critics, whether they like it or not, they also know that the director is not trying to please the audience; but "Interstellar" is a commercial film, and communication with the audience is undoubtedly the most important, which also makes the film critics full of fire.
So, does this mean that Renly's "Waterloo" just appeared?
Unfortunately, the haters still need to wait.
The brutality of the bad reviews, the choking and disappointment of the middle reviews, were all drowned in the cheers and applause of the praises. A full 38 praises sounded the sailing horn of the "Interstellar Crossing" media review!
"New York Times", 100 points, "Is it another "2001 Space Odyssey"? Obviously not! "Interstellar" just tells a very light and very personal story, putting all the center of gravity on' The theme of'Love and Sacrifice' brought about the heaviest and most profound emotional collision of 2014! Nolan brought an emotional bond experience that was more sincere than Inception."
"Hollywood Reporter", 100 points, "I can predict that many people will inevitably put this movie next to the '2001 Space Odyssey' for comparison. In fact, this is a kind of praise; but unfortunately, this is not another. An'Odyssey', and Nolan is not another Kubrick. Nolan tells a story of returning to his homeland in his own way, traversing the obstacles of time and space, leaving aside the discussion of humanity and divinity, But sincerely tells the fetters of human beings that are the most real and closest."
The original English name of "2001: A Space Odyssey" was "2001: A Space Odyssey". It borrowed from the story of the second half of Homer's epic, the "Odyssey", to deduce a space adventure; now, "Interstellar Crossing" also tells an Odyssey. Style homecoming story, so the "Hollywood Reporter" has such a saying.
"Chicago Sun", 100 points, "Undoubtedly, this is the most outstanding science fiction film in the new century. It uses a thrilling space adventure to think about the meaning of life and the meaning of family, and even further explore the relationship between humans and society. From another perspective, the relationship between space science fiction movies gave new vitality to space science fiction movies! The actors led by Hall, Hathaway and Chastain gave wonderful performances, which made the story full of countless charm and worth chewing. Nothing. Doubt, this is a masterpiece!"
"Empire", one hundred points, "One of the most exciting movies in the new century! Full of wisdom! Full of special effects! Full of reflection and precipitation! Almost equivalent to Stephen Hawking's "Star Trek": a happening in The space opera inside the brain then interprets the soul's changes in time and space, perfectly combining science and humanity! The most surprising part is still Lanly Hall, whose unique touch gives characters and movies Amazing and unique charm, who else can say'no' to him?"
"Daily Telegraph", 100 points, "This is Nolan's most ambitious and outstanding work so far! A high degree of technology and thought! It truly serves all scientific theories and shooting techniques to emotions, Characters! Characters! Characters! This is the core of the whole movie, and then gives full play to the unique charm of the strong cast of casts, which is definitely enough to rank among the best in the new century, a masterpiece not to be missed!"
One hundred points.
One hundred points.
It's still a hundred points.
There are as many as ten media that gave full marks to the media, including absolute industry authoritative media such as the "New York Times" and "Hollywood Reporter", which laid a firm foundation for the media review of "Interstellar" with an unwavering attitude. Basically, the number of full scores of ten professional media is exactly the same as the number of media that gave middle reviews. In other words, as many media as dissatisfied, then there are as many media that give perfect praise without reservation.
It can be clearly seen that the most dissatisfied part of China Commentary Media is the "emotional" part. The continuous rendering of too soap operas and too sensational completely destroyed the depth and weight of science fiction movies-in fact, this can also be regarded as " The difference between "hard science fiction" and "soft science fiction", hard science fiction always has more possibilities for discussion at the technical level, so it has the possibility of extension and expansion in artificial intelligence, humanity and divinity.
"Gravity" can be regarded as a half example. This work cannot be regarded as a hard science fiction, but the core discussion about the origin of life has the possibility of sublimation and interpretation, so it has been praised by the film critics; "Interstellar Crossing" "On the contrary, it can be said that the gods have returned to the world.
The full score media just recognized the "soft science fiction" part. They think this is Nolan's discussion of human nature. Although it is a little bit clichéd and simple, it has also completed the foothold from science fiction to emotion-this can't be regarded as A kind of sublimation should become a kind of return, so that the audience can find resonance.
Is "2001 A Space Odyssey" a classic? Yes! But it does not mean that all science fiction movies need to be developed in the direction of "2001 Space Odyssey".
The same factor is a shortcoming in the eyes of some people, and an advantage in the eyes of some people. This is the difference.
In addition to the ten full-point media, there are 28 other media that gave good reviews. The rating range extends from 70 points to 95 points. The large span can still be felt from the side. The fierce controversy aroused, that kind of ambiguous movie viewing experience is indeed mixed.
"Vanity Fair", 95 points, "Unexpectedly, Interstellar has become a vigorous beast in the virgin jungle of Hollywood. The magnificent picture presents an epic sense, while the delicate emotion awakens resonance, which seems light. The simple fetters narrative has caused a lot of turbulent reflections. Although I know this is a commonplace talk, but...Len Li-Hall is still the core of the whole movie, and his performance once again lights up the big screen!"
"New York Post", 90 minutes, "Like all successful sci-fi movies in the past, Christopher Nolan used powerful image language and visual effects to create a space adventure, and finally all mirror images were reflected to humans. In my own body, I look at myself through science fiction. Although Nolan’s discussion topic this time is a bit narrow, but the depth and complexity are surprising ~ www.novelhall.com~ is more sincere than any previous work."
"Complete movie", eighty-eight points, "Although the length of the movie is frustrating, and the third part is completely reduced to a soap opera; but it still cannot conceal the fact that'Interstellar' is a space opera, it is worthy of all forms Praise, really touch the softness in the heart and the thinking deep in the soul through the image. It is about human nature and time. The most interesting thing is the fetters and loneliness between the individual and the family.
The splendor and excellence of this movie makes people wonder again: Should we bring all the directors and producers of science fiction films to one theater, and then collectively watch Stanley Kubrick's sub-shots—— It was already a manuscript a light year ago, but it is still the best in the industry. Nolan has only learned half of his skills and has dedicated himself as a candidate for the best science fiction film in the new century. "
"Independent Telegraph", 83 points, "full of wisdom and full of surprises. Interstellar is exactly the kind of work most urgently needed by the contemporary Hollywood industry. No matter how much film critics hate soap operas and sensational parts, it is undeniable Yes, it has found a balance between business and art. Nolan has transformed the mysterious and unpredictable space into a children’s playground, but every picture of visual effects and sound effects can trigger the audience’s thinking, at least , It encourages you to think about time, about family, about loneliness, and about yourself."
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
"San Francisco Chronicle", fifty minutes.
"Los Angeles Times", forty minutes.
"Voice of the Village", 60 minutes.
"The Guardian", fifty points.
When I saw all these failing scores, I couldn't believe that this was actually a cooperative project of "Nolanga Hall", which was shocking.
In addition, there is also the "Variety Show" magazine, which also gave a 60-point evaluation.
"This movie can be expanded in many ways, but unfortunately, Nolan chose to present this ambitious project in the most boring and least breathtaking way, completely lost in the vastness and vagueness of space. Among them, even Hall's high-level performance failed to save the mediocrity and tackiness at the core of the theme.
Does Nolan only have this kind of understanding of family affection? Or is it that Nolan's film language is not enough to show the complexity and depth of human nature? Is the director who filmed the "Dark Knight" still there? The only good news is that those talking to themselves in space cannot be heard on Earth. "
Starting from the serious negative reviews of "Playlist", "Interstellar" is being chased by film critics, severe criticism is endless, and you can clearly feel the hatred of iron and steel from the industry, which is the core of Nolan's story. And the main direction is totally different.
If you look carefully at the film reviews, you can find that the criticism mainly comes from disappointment and gaps.
Science fiction movies such as "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Blade Runner" can withstand the test of time and eventually become classics of movie history. The main reason lies in the discussion of human nature. In the context of science fiction-humans and clones, humans and The exploration of human nature between machines has undoubtedly raised the ideological core of the film to a whole new level.
However, "Interstellar Crossing" has put all its focus on... "Generating electricity with love". From the perspective of depth and breadth of thinking, this is definitely a serious miss. Although at the end of the movie, Lan Li once again used performances to regain a city, giving the theme more possibilities; but since the reunion of Cooper and Murphy, the whole story has lost the possibility of deep thinking, let alone stand the test of time Now you can see the essence of its "soap opera".
This is definitely not the space epic that people are looking forward to.
It seems that this is the most severe criticism and attack on Renly's work since "detachment". To be precise, even "detachment" has not faced such a fierce attack-at least, "detachment" is an author's film. Film critics, whether they like it or not, they also know that the director is not trying to please the audience; but "Interstellar" is a commercial film, and communication with the audience is undoubtedly the most important, which also makes the film critics full of fire.
So, does this mean that Renly's "Waterloo" just appeared?
Unfortunately, the haters still need to wait.
The brutality of the bad reviews, the choking and disappointment of the middle reviews, were all drowned in the cheers and applause of the praises. A full 38 praises sounded the sailing horn of the "Interstellar Crossing" media review!
"New York Times", 100 points, "Is it another "2001 Space Odyssey"? Obviously not! "Interstellar" just tells a very light and very personal story, putting all the center of gravity on' The theme of'Love and Sacrifice' brought about the heaviest and most profound emotional collision of 2014! Nolan brought an emotional bond experience that was more sincere than Inception."
"Hollywood Reporter", 100 points, "I can predict that many people will inevitably put this movie next to the '2001 Space Odyssey' for comparison. In fact, this is a kind of praise; but unfortunately, this is not another. An'Odyssey', and Nolan is not another Kubrick. Nolan tells a story of returning to his homeland in his own way, traversing the obstacles of time and space, leaving aside the discussion of humanity and divinity, But sincerely tells the fetters of human beings that are the most real and closest."
The original English name of "2001: A Space Odyssey" was "2001: A Space Odyssey". It borrowed from the story of the second half of Homer's epic, the "Odyssey", to deduce a space adventure; now, "Interstellar Crossing" also tells an Odyssey. Style homecoming story, so the "Hollywood Reporter" has such a saying.
"Chicago Sun", 100 points, "Undoubtedly, this is the most outstanding science fiction film in the new century. It uses a thrilling space adventure to think about the meaning of life and the meaning of family, and even further explore the relationship between humans and society. From another perspective, the relationship between space science fiction movies gave new vitality to space science fiction movies! The actors led by Hall, Hathaway and Chastain gave wonderful performances, which made the story full of countless charm and worth chewing. Nothing. Doubt, this is a masterpiece!"
"Empire", one hundred points, "One of the most exciting movies in the new century! Full of wisdom! Full of special effects! Full of reflection and precipitation! Almost equivalent to Stephen Hawking's "Star Trek": a happening in The space opera inside the brain then interprets the soul's changes in time and space, perfectly combining science and humanity! The most surprising part is still Lanly Hall, whose unique touch gives characters and movies Amazing and unique charm, who else can say'no' to him?"
"Daily Telegraph", 100 points, "This is Nolan's most ambitious and outstanding work so far! A high degree of technology and thought! It truly serves all scientific theories and shooting techniques to emotions, Characters! Characters! Characters! This is the core of the whole movie, and then gives full play to the unique charm of the strong cast of casts, which is definitely enough to rank among the best in the new century, a masterpiece not to be missed!"
One hundred points.
One hundred points.
It's still a hundred points.
There are as many as ten media that gave full marks to the media, including absolute industry authoritative media such as the "New York Times" and "Hollywood Reporter", which laid a firm foundation for the media review of "Interstellar" with an unwavering attitude. Basically, the number of full scores of ten professional media is exactly the same as the number of media that gave middle reviews. In other words, as many media as dissatisfied, then there are as many media that give perfect praise without reservation.
It can be clearly seen that the most dissatisfied part of China Commentary Media is the "emotional" part. The continuous rendering of too soap operas and too sensational completely destroyed the depth and weight of science fiction movies-in fact, this can also be regarded as " The difference between "hard science fiction" and "soft science fiction", hard science fiction always has more possibilities for discussion at the technical level, so it has the possibility of extension and expansion in artificial intelligence, humanity and divinity.
"Gravity" can be regarded as a half example. This work cannot be regarded as a hard science fiction, but the core discussion about the origin of life has the possibility of sublimation and interpretation, so it has been praised by the film critics; "Interstellar Crossing" "On the contrary, it can be said that the gods have returned to the world.
The full score media just recognized the "soft science fiction" part. They think this is Nolan's discussion of human nature. Although it is a little bit clichéd and simple, it has also completed the foothold from science fiction to emotion-this can't be regarded as A kind of sublimation should become a kind of return, so that the audience can find resonance.
Is "2001 A Space Odyssey" a classic? Yes! But it does not mean that all science fiction movies need to be developed in the direction of "2001 Space Odyssey".
The same factor is a shortcoming in the eyes of some people, and an advantage in the eyes of some people. This is the difference.
In addition to the ten full-point media, there are 28 other media that gave good reviews. The rating range extends from 70 points to 95 points. The large span can still be felt from the side. The fierce controversy aroused, that kind of ambiguous movie viewing experience is indeed mixed.
"Vanity Fair", 95 points, "Unexpectedly, Interstellar has become a vigorous beast in the virgin jungle of Hollywood. The magnificent picture presents an epic sense, while the delicate emotion awakens resonance, which seems light. The simple fetters narrative has caused a lot of turbulent reflections. Although I know this is a commonplace talk, but...Len Li-Hall is still the core of the whole movie, and his performance once again lights up the big screen!"
"New York Post", 90 minutes, "Like all successful sci-fi movies in the past, Christopher Nolan used powerful image language and visual effects to create a space adventure, and finally all mirror images were reflected to humans. In my own body, I look at myself through science fiction. Although Nolan’s discussion topic this time is a bit narrow, but the depth and complexity are surprising ~ www.novelhall.com~ is more sincere than any previous work."
"Complete movie", eighty-eight points, "Although the length of the movie is frustrating, and the third part is completely reduced to a soap opera; but it still cannot conceal the fact that'Interstellar' is a space opera, it is worthy of all forms Praise, really touch the softness in the heart and the thinking deep in the soul through the image. It is about human nature and time. The most interesting thing is the fetters and loneliness between the individual and the family.
The splendor and excellence of this movie makes people wonder again: Should we bring all the directors and producers of science fiction films to one theater, and then collectively watch Stanley Kubrick's sub-shots—— It was already a manuscript a light year ago, but it is still the best in the industry. Nolan has only learned half of his skills and has dedicated himself as a candidate for the best science fiction film in the new century. "
"Independent Telegraph", 83 points, "full of wisdom and full of surprises. Interstellar is exactly the kind of work most urgently needed by the contemporary Hollywood industry. No matter how much film critics hate soap operas and sensational parts, it is undeniable Yes, it has found a balance between business and art. Nolan has transformed the mysterious and unpredictable space into a children’s playground, but every picture of visual effects and sound effects can trigger the audience’s thinking, at least , It encourages you to think about time, about family, about loneliness, and about yourself."
"San Francisco Chronicle", fifty minutes."Los Angeles Times", forty minutes."Voice of the Village", 60 minutes."The Guardian", fifty points.When I saw all these failing scores, I couldn't believe that this was actually a cooperative project of "Nolanga Hall", which was shocking.In addition, there is also the "Variety Show" magazine, which also gave a 60-point evaluation."This movie can be expanded in many ways, but unfortunately, Nolan chose to present this ambitious project in the most boring and least breathtaking way, completely lost in the vastness and vagueness of space. Among them, even Hall's high-level performance failed to save the mediocrity and tackiness at the core of the theme.Does Nolan only have this kind of understanding of family affection? Or is it that Nolan's film language is not enough to show the complexity and depth of human nature? Is the director who filmed the "Dark Knight" still there? The only good news is that those talking to themselves in space cannot be heard on Earth. "Starting from the serious negative reviews of "Playlist", "Interstellar" is being chased by film critics, severe criticism is endless, and you can clearly feel the hatred of iron and steel from the industry, which is the core of Nolan's story. And the main direction is totally different.If you look carefully at the film reviews, you can find that the criticism mainly comes from disappointment and gaps.Science fiction movies such as "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Blade Runner" can withstand the test of time and eventually become classics of movie history. The main reason lies in the discussion of human nature. In the context of science fiction-humans and clones, humans and The exploration of human nature between machines has undoubtedly raised the ideological core of the film to a whole new level.However, "Interstellar Crossing" has put all its focus on... "Generating electricity with love". From the perspective of depth and breadth of thinking, this is definitely a serious miss. Although at the end of the movie, Lan Li once again used performances to regain a city, giving the theme more possibilities; but since the reunion of Cooper and Murphy, the whole story has lost the possibility of deep thinking, let alone stand the test of time Now you can see the essence of its "soap opera".This is definitely not the space epic that people are looking forward to.It seems that this is the most severe criticism and attack on Renly's work since "detachment". To be precise, even "detachment" has not faced such a fierce attack-at least, "detachment" is an author's film. Film critics, whether they like it or not, they also know that the director is not trying to please the audience; but "Interstellar" is a commercial film, and communication with the audience is undoubtedly the most important, which also makes the film critics full of fire.So, does this mean that Renly's "Waterloo" just appeared?Unfortunately, the haters still need to wait.The brutality of the bad reviews, the choking and disappointment of the middle reviews, were all drowned in the cheers and applause of the praises. A full 38 praises sounded the sailing horn of the "Interstellar Crossing" media review!"New York Times", 100 points, "Is it another "2001 Space Odyssey"? Obviously not! "Interstellar" just tells a very light and very personal story, putting all the center of gravity on' The theme of'Love and Sacrifice' brought about the heaviest and most profound emotional collision of 2014! Nolan brought an emotional bond experience that was more sincere than Inception.""Hollywood Reporter", 100 points, "I can predict that many people will inevitably put this movie next to the '2001 Space Odyssey' for comparison. In fact, this is a kind of praise; but unfortunately, this is not another. An'Odyssey', and Nolan is not another Kubrick. Nolan tells a story of returning to his homeland in his own way, traversing the obstacles of time and space, leaving aside the discussion of humanity and divinity, But sincerely tells the fetters of human beings that are the most real and closest."The original English name of "2001: A Space Odyssey" was "2001: A Space Odyssey". It borrowed from the story of the second half of Homer's epic, the "Odyssey", to deduce a space adventure; now, "Interstellar Crossing" also tells an Odyssey. Style homecoming story, so the "Hollywood Reporter" has such a saying."Chicago Sun", 100 points, "Undoubtedly, this is the most outstanding science fiction film in the new century. It uses a thrilling space adventure to think about the meaning of life and the meaning of family, and even further explore the relationship between humans and society. From another perspective, the relationship between space science fiction movies gave new vitality to space science fiction movies! The actors led by Hall, Hathaway and Chastain gave wonderful performances, which made the story full of countless charm and worth chewing. Nothing. Doubt, this is a masterpiece!""Empire", one hundred points, "One of the most exciting movies in the new century! Full of wisdom! Full of special effects! Full of reflection and precipitation! Almost equivalent to Stephen Hawking's "Star Trek": a happening in The space opera inside the brain then interprets the soul's changes in time and space, perfectly combining science and humanity! The most surprising part is still Lanly Hall, whose unique touch gives characters and movies Amazing and unique charm, who else can say'no' to him?""Daily Telegraph", 100 points, "This is Nolan's most ambitious and outstanding work so far! A high degree of technology and thought! It truly serves all scientific theories and shooting techniques to emotions, Characters! Characters! Characters! This is the core of the whole movie, and then gives full play to the unique charm of the strong cast of casts, which is definitely enough to rank among the best in the new century, a masterpiece not to be missed!"One hundred points.One hundred points.It's still a hundred points.There are as many as ten media that gave full marks to the media, including absolute industry authoritative media such as the "New York Times" and "Hollywood Reporter", which laid a firm foundation for the media review of "Interstellar" with an unwavering attitude. Basically, the number of full scores of ten professional media is exactly the same as the number of media that gave middle reviews. In other words, as many media as dissatisfied, then there are as many media that give perfect praise without reservation.It can be clearly seen that the most dissatisfied part of China Commentary Media is the "emotional" part. The continuous rendering of too soap operas and too sensational completely destroyed the depth and weight of science fiction movies-in fact, this can also be regarded as " The difference between "hard science fiction" and "soft science fiction", hard science fiction always has more possibilities for discussion at the technical level, so it has the possibility of extension and expansion in artificial intelligence, humanity and divinity."Gravity" can be regarded as a half example. This work cannot be regarded as a hard science fiction, but the core discussion about the origin of life has the possibility of sublimation and interpretation, so it has been praised by the film critics; "Interstellar Crossing" "On the contrary, it can be said that the gods have returned to the world.The full score media just recognized the "soft science fiction" part. They think this is Nolan's discussion of human nature. Although it is a little bit clichd and simple, it has also completed the foothold from science fiction to emotion-this can't be regarded as A kind of sublimation should become a kind of return, so that the audience can find resonance.Is "2001 A Space Odyssey" a classic? Yes! But it does not mean that all science fiction movies need to be developed in the direction of "2001 Space Odyssey".The same factor is a shortcoming in the eyes of some people, and an advantage in the eyes of some people. This is the difference.In addition to the ten full-point media, there are 28 other media that gave good reviews. The rating range extends from 70 points to 95 points. The large span can still be felt from the side. The fierce controversy aroused, that kind of ambiguous movie viewing experience is indeed mixed."Vanity Fair", 95 points, "Unexpectedly, Interstellar has become a vigorous beast in the virgin jungle of Hollywood. The magnificent picture presents an epic sense, while the delicate emotion awakens resonance, which seems light. The simple fetters narrative has caused a lot of turbulent reflections. Although I know this is a commonplace talk, but...Len Li-Hall is still the core of the whole movie, and his performance once again lights up the big screen!""New York Post", 90 minutes, "Like all successful sci-fi movies in the past, Christopher Nolan used powerful image language and visual effects to create a space adventure, and finally all mirror images were reflected to humans. In my own body, I look at myself through science fiction. Although Nolan's discussion topic this time is a bit narrow, but the depth and complexity are surprising ~ www.novelhall.com~ is more sincere than any previous work.""Complete movie", eighty-eight points, "Although the length of the movie is frustrating, and the third part is completely reduced to a soap opera; but it still cannot conceal the fact that'Interstellar' is a space opera, it is worthy of all forms Praise, really touch the softness in the heart and the thinking deep in the soul through the image. It is about human nature and time. The most interesting thing is the fetters and loneliness between the individual and the family.The splendor and excellence of this movie makes people wonder again: Should we bring all the directors and producers of science fiction films to one theater, and then collectively watch Stanley Kubrick's sub-shots It was already a manuscript a light year ago, but it is still the best in the industry. Nolan has only learned half of his skills and has dedicated himself as a candidate for the best science fiction film in the new century. ""Independent Telegraph", 83 points, "full of wisdom and full of surprises. Interstellar is exactly the kind of work most urgently needed by the contemporary Hollywood industry. No matter how much film critics hate soap operas and sensational parts, it is undeniable Yes, it has found a balance between business and art. Nolan has transformed the mysterious and unpredictable space into a children's playground, but every picture of visual effects and sound effects can trigger the audience's thinking, at least , It encourages you to think about time, about family, about loneliness, and about yourself."
